rspec/rules/S1764/java/comments-and-links.adoc

26 lines
695 B
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

=== On 2014-10-01T11:39:51Z Nicolas Peru Wrote:
Sub task for RSPEC-1764 with updated description for Java, please review.
=== On 2014-10-01T11:44:49Z Ann Campbell Wrote:
\[~nicolas.peru] I question retaining this noncompliant example:
----
if (5 / 5) { // always 1
doV();
}
----
In C, >=1 evaluates to true & 0 evaluates to false. Is it that the same holds true in Java but it's just considered very bad form? If so, then why eliminate this one:
----
if (5 - 5) { // always 0
do_u();
}
----
?
Also, we have a different rule that yells at people for using equality operators with floating-point numbers, so the first exception is doubly confusing
include::../comments-and-links.adoc[]