rspec/rules/S2245/comments-and-links.adoc

27 lines
998 B
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

=== Related: RSPEC-3329
=== Related: RSPEC-4347
=== On 2015-01-16T08:54:49Z Sébastien Gioria Wrote:
This rule should be tag OWASP-Top10. It's part of OWASP Top10 A6-Sensitive_Data_Exposure.
It could bee tag also :
* CWE Entry 310 on Cryptographic Issues (\http://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/310.html)
* CWE Entry 326 on Weak Encryption (\http://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/326.html)
=== On 2015-01-19T09:04:43Z Ann Campbell Wrote:
Thanks [~sebastien.gioria]
=== On 2018-07-27T20:50:24Z Ann Campbell Wrote:
\[~nicolas.harraudeau] where do you expect the issue to be raised? On the ``++rand()++`` call or where the value is used?
=== On 2018-07-30T10:05:05Z Nicolas Harraudeau Wrote:
\[~ann.campbell.2] On the rand() call. This is a hotspot because we are not yet able to detect if the context is dangerous or not.
We could later detect that an encryption function or a hash is using the generated value, but it would then be classified as a Vulnerability instead of a Hotspot.