rspec/rules/S2696/csharp/rule.adoc

27 lines
615 B
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

Correctly updating a ``++static++`` field from a non-static method is tricky to get right and could easily lead to bugs if there are multiple class instances and/or multiple threads in play.
2020-06-30 12:48:07 +02:00
2021-02-02 15:02:10 +01:00
This rule raises an issue each time a ``++static++`` field is updated from a non-static method or property.
2020-06-30 12:48:07 +02:00
== Noncompliant Code Example
----
public class MyClass
{
private static int count = 0;
public void DoSomething()
{
//...
count++; // Noncompliant
}
}
----
ifdef::rspecator-view[]
== Comments And Links
(visible only on this page)
include::comments-and-links.adoc[]
endif::rspecator-view[]