rspec/rules/S2709/python/rule.adoc

Python interprets ``++False++`` as a "false" boolean value, and ``++True++`` as a "true" boolean value. Assigning them other values could lead to unexpected behaviors.


This rule raises an issue when "True" and "False", with any case, are used as identifiers.


== Noncompliant Code Example

----
True = "red"  # Noncompliant
----


== Compliant Solution

----
color = "red"  # Noncompliant
----


ifdef::rspecator-view[]
== Comments And Links
(visible only on this page)

include::comments-and-links.adoc[]
endif::rspecator-view[]
Restructure one-lang rspecs 2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00			Python interprets ``++False++`` as a "false" boolean value, and ``++True++`` as a "true" boolean value. Assigning them other values could lead to unexpected behaviors.


			`This rule raises an issue when "True" and "False", with any case, are used as identifiers.`

Fix the missing default metadata fields 2021-04-28 18:08:03 +02:00
Restructure one-lang rspecs 2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00			`== Noncompliant Code Example`

			`----`
			`True = "red" # Noncompliant`
			`----`

Fix the missing default metadata fields 2021-04-28 18:08:03 +02:00
Restructure one-lang rspecs 2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00			`== Compliant Solution`

			`----`
			`color = "red" # Noncompliant`
			`----`
Fix the missing default metadata fields 2021-04-28 18:08:03 +02:00
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00
			`ifdef::rspecator-view[]`
			`== Comments And Links`
			`(visible only on this page)`

			`include::comments-and-links.adoc[]`
			`endif::rspecator-view[]`