15 lines
901 B
Plaintext
15 lines
901 B
Plaintext
|
=== On 2015-04-08T17:03:24Z Evgeny Mandrikov Wrote:
|
||
|
|
\[~ann.campbell.2] in {cpp} compared to Java, notion of "null" exists in a bit different form(s) - see \http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/types/NULL
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
So actually wonder - whether we should use term (styled as code) "null", or "nullptr" or "0"? WDYT?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
=== On 2015-04-08T19:10:45Z Ann Campbell Wrote:
|
||
|
|
I've removed the code formatting on "null" but don't want to use 0 instead here because \"``++this++`` can never be 0" doesn't read as smoothly (i.e. takes a little more thought to understand IMO) than \"``++this++`` can never be null".
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
=== On 2015-05-28T12:22:38Z Evgeny Mandrikov Wrote:
|
||
|
|
\[~ann.campbell.2] I changed title and message according to your last comment, added literal "nullptr" into description and did simplification of examples. Could you please check?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
=== On 2015-05-29T12:34:58Z Ann Campbell Wrote:
|
||
|
|
looks good [~evgeny.mandrikov]
|
||
|
|
|