14 lines
761 B
Plaintext
14 lines
761 B
Plaintext
|
=== On 2017-03-16T12:11:37Z Ann Campbell Wrote:
|
||
|
|
\[~amaury.leve] I've edited. Please double-check me.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Also, examples for each noncompliant case aren't necessary IMO. I'd show only one or two particularly damaging or particularly subtle examples.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
=== On 2017-03-24T16:05:50Z Valeri Hristov Wrote:
|
||
|
|
The following check is not implemented because it is difficult to know exactly which fields should be marked with ``++NonSerialized++`` and I am afraid it will generate too many FPs:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
* Non-serializable fields are not marked with the ``++System.NonSerializedAttribute++`` attribute.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
We find mostly classes that derive from Exception in the projects we test and that's why they might not be a good source for checking issues and false positives (statistically).
|
||
|
|
|