rspec/rules/S4970/comments-and-links.adoc

10 lines
710 B
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

=== On 2018-10-31T12:43:15Z Ann Campbell Wrote:
\[~alexandre.gigleux] the title doesn't match what the code blocks tell me to do. This _seems_\(?) to be about removing the dead ``++catch++`` block for the parent exception type, but the title indicates the problem is with the child ``++catch++`` instead.
=== On 2018-11-13T12:36:58Z Alexandre Gigleux Wrote:
Confirmed by [~valeri.hristov] that this one doesn't make sense for C# nor VB.NET as the compiler is handling it and raised error to prevent such case.
=== On 2021-05-19T15:38:44.514Z Michael Gumowski Wrote:
Simplifying the reporting as we now rely on ECJ. The logic was anyway extremely hard to follow (both in terms of logic and issue messaging).