rspec/rules/S5704/python/rule.adoc

54 lines
1.5 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00
A bare ``++raise++`` statement, i.e. a ``++raise++`` with no exception provided, will re-raise the last active exception in the current scope. If no exception is active a ``++RuntimeError++`` is raised instead.
If the bare "raise" statement is in a ``++finally++`` block, it will only have an active exception to re-raise when an exception from the ``++try++`` block is not caught or when an exception is raised by an ``++except++`` or ``++else++`` block. Thus bare ``++raise++`` statements should not be relied upon in ``++finally++`` blocks. It is simpler to let the exception raise automatically.
This rule raises an issue when a bare ``++raise++`` statements is in a ``++finally++`` block.
2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00
== Noncompliant Code Example
----
def foo(param):
result = 0
try:
print("foo")
except ValueError as e:
pass
else:
if param:
raise ValueError()
finally:
if param:
raise # Noncompliant. This will fail in some context.
else:
result = 1
return result
----
2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00
== Compliant Solution
----
def foo(param):
result = 0
try:
print("foo")
except ValueError as e:
pass
else:
if param:
raise ValueError()
finally:
if not param:
result = 1
# the exception will raise automatically
return result
----
2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00
== See
* Python Documentation - https://docs.python.org/3/reference/simple_stmts.html#raise[The ``++raise++`` statement]