rspec/rules/S2188/java/rule.adoc

== Why is this an issue?

Overriding a parent class method prevents that method from being called unless an explicit ``++super++`` call is made in the overriding method. In some cases not calling the ``++super++`` method is acceptable, but not with ``++setUp++`` and ``++tearDown++`` in a JUnit 3 ``++TestCase++``.


=== Noncompliant code example

[source,java]
----
public class MyClassTest extends MyAbstractTestCase {

  private MyClass myClass;
    @Override
    protected void setUp() throws Exception {  // Noncompliant
      myClass = new MyClass();
    }
----


=== Compliant solution

[source,java]
----
public class MyClassTest extends MyAbstractTestCase {

  private MyClass myClass;
    @Override
    protected void setUp() throws Exception {
      super.setUp();
      myClass = new MyClass();
    }
----



ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]

'''
== Implementation Specification
(visible only on this page)

=== Message

Add a "super.[setUp()|tearDown()]" call to this method.


'''
== Comments And Links
(visible only on this page)

=== on 24 Nov 2014, 19:27:21 Nicolas Peru wrote:
\[~ann.campbell.2]This is not relevant since junit 4 might be worth mentionning that it only concerns Junit 3 way of writing tests.

=== on 1 Dec 2014, 17:22:33 Ann Campbell wrote:
done [~nicolas.peru]

endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]