rspec/rules/S2957/swift/rule.adoc

== Why is this an issue?

When a closure contains only a ``++return++`` statement, the ``++return++`` itself can be omitted.


=== Noncompliant code example

[source,swift]
----
someList.sort { a, b in
  return a > b
}
----


=== Compliant solution

[source,swift]
----
someList.sort { a, b in a > b }
----


ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]

'''
== Implementation Specification
(visible only on this page)

=== Message

Remove the "return" keyword.


'''
== Comments And Links
(visible only on this page)

=== on 20 May 2015, 18:13:45 Ann Campbell wrote:
\[~elena.vilchik] I suspect a standard "for greater readability" argument is expected here, but it's hard for me to make it. Feel free to add it yourself. :-)

=== on 21 May 2015, 07:13:19 Elena Vilchik wrote:
\[~ann.campbell.2] what do you mean "argument"? Anyway I looks good to me now :)

=== on 3 Feb 2016, 17:11:53 Ann Campbell wrote:
\[~elena.vilchik] I just now saw your response (doh!). In this case "argument" == "reason".

endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]