rspec/rules/S1784/java/rule.adoc

== Why is this an issue?


ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]

'''
== Implementation Specification
(visible only on this page)

include::../message.adoc[]

'''
== Comments And Links
(visible only on this page)

=== on 30 Sep 2014, 16:00:29 Ann Campbell wrote:
It's okay to have package-level methods

endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]
Inline adoc when include has no additional value (#1940) Inline adoc files when they are included exactly once. Also fix language tags because this inlining gives us better information on what language the code is written in. 2023-05-25 14:18:12 +02:00			`== Why is this an issue?`

Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]`
RULEAPI-666: Migrate the "List of parameters", "Highlighting" and "Message" fields from jira RSPEC (#346) 2021-09-20 15:38:42 +02:00
			`'''`
			`== Implementation Specification`
			`(visible only on this page)`

			`include::../message.adoc[]`

RULEAPI-576: add a horizontal rule between rule description and comments 2021-06-08 15:52:13 +02:00			`'''`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`== Comments And Links`
			`(visible only on this page)`

Inline adoc when include has no additional value (#1940) Inline adoc files when they are included exactly once. Also fix language tags because this inlining gives us better information on what language the code is written in. 2023-05-25 14:18:12 +02:00			`=== on 30 Sep 2014, 16:00:29 Ann Campbell wrote:`
			`It's okay to have package-level methods`

Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]`