2023-05-03 11:06:20 +02:00
== Why is this an issue?
2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00
Using a type parameter when you don't have to simply obfuscates the code. Qualifying an inner type with a type parameter will compile, but confuse maintainers.
2021-04-28 18:08:03 +02:00
2023-05-03 11:06:20 +02:00
=== Noncompliant code example
2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00
2022-02-04 17:28:24 +01:00
[source,java]
2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00
----
<T extends Map> T doTheThing(T.Entry type) { // Noncompliant
//...
}
----
2021-04-28 18:08:03 +02:00
2023-05-03 11:06:20 +02:00
=== Compliant solution
2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00
2022-02-04 17:28:24 +01:00
[source,java]
2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00
----
<T extends Map> T doTheThing(Map.Entry type) {
//...
}
----
2021-04-28 18:08:03 +02:00
2021-09-20 15:38:42 +02:00
ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]
'''
== Implementation Specification
(visible only on this page)
2023-05-25 14:18:12 +02:00
=== Message
Use "xxx" here instead of "y".
=== Highlighting
Unnecessary type param
2021-09-20 15:38:42 +02:00
endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]