rspec/rules/S1110/comments-and-links.adoc

=== on 3 Jul 2013, 16:32:21 Freddy Mallet wrote:
Is implemented by \http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SONARJAVA-194

=== on 14 Mar 2017, 18:06:01 Elena Vilchik wrote:
\[~ann.campbell.2] Current documented highlighting (the extra ``++(++`` and ``++)++``) can't be implemented, only solid range is possible. We can highlight one parenthesis as primary location and another one as secondary. WDYT? 

IMO entire expression is better in this case.

=== on 14 Mar 2017, 18:32:04 Ann Campbell wrote:
+1 [~elena.vilchik] & thanks for the catch. Highlighting updated.
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 3 Jul 2013, 16:32:21 Freddy Mallet wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`Is implemented by \http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SONARJAVA-194`

Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 14 Mar 2017, 18:06:01 Elena Vilchik wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			\[~ann.campbell.2] Current documented highlighting (the extra ``++(++`` and ``++)++``) can't be implemented, only solid range is possible. We can highlight one parenthesis as primary location and another one as secondary. WDYT?

			`IMO entire expression is better in this case.`

Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 14 Mar 2017, 18:32:04 Ann Campbell wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`+1 [~elena.vilchik] & thanks for the catch. Highlighting updated.`