rspec/rules/S2291/rspecator.adoc

ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]

'''
== Implementation Specification
(visible only on this page)

=== Message

Refactor this code to handle "OverflowException".


'''
== Comments And Links
(visible only on this page)

=== on 13 Apr 2015, 10:44:27 Freddy Mallet wrote:
@Tamas, according to you, does this rule makes sense ? Thanks

=== on 29 Jun 2015, 14:58:19 Tamas Vajk wrote:
\[~ann.campbell.2] I've modified the description to be more specific. Also, I've changed the examples to use `List<int>` because for `double`s it won't throw the `OverflowException`.


\[~freddy.mallet] Yes, the rule makes sense.

=== on 30 Jun 2015, 14:45:28 Ann Campbell wrote:
Double-check my edits please [~tamas.vajk]

=== on 6 Jul 2015, 09:33:41 Tamas Vajk wrote:
\[~ann.campbell.2] Looks good.

endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]
Validate asciidoc ifdef/endif (#3311) Fix kotlin:S6511 2023-10-18 11:43:40 +02:00			`ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]`
Modify rule S2291: LAYC format (#2169) 2023-06-15 10:20:09 +02:00
			`'''`
			`== Implementation Specification`
			`(visible only on this page)`

			`=== Message`

			`Refactor this code to handle "OverflowException".`


			`'''`
			`== Comments And Links`
			`(visible only on this page)`

			`=== on 13 Apr 2015, 10:44:27 Freddy Mallet wrote:`
			`@Tamas, according to you, does this rule makes sense ? Thanks`

			`=== on 29 Jun 2015, 14:58:19 Tamas Vajk wrote:`
			\[~ann.campbell.2] I've modified the description to be more specific. Also, I've changed the examples to use `List<int>` because for `double`s it won't throw the `OverflowException`.


			`\[~freddy.mallet] Yes, the rule makes sense.`

			`=== on 30 Jun 2015, 14:45:28 Ann Campbell wrote:`
			`Double-check my edits please [~tamas.vajk]`

			`=== on 6 Jul 2015, 09:33:41 Tamas Vajk wrote:`
			`\[~ann.campbell.2] Looks good.`

Validate asciidoc ifdef/endif (#3311) Fix kotlin:S6511 2023-10-18 11:43:40 +02:00			`endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]`