rspec/rules/S3367/java/rule.adoc

60 lines
1.6 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

== Why is this an issue?
2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00
Validation is the first line of defense against injection, cross-site scripting, and many other attacks. Omitting it in modern web applications is simply negligent.
When creating a Struts ``++ActionForm++``, you have the choice of extending something from the ``++org.apache.struts.action++`` package, or extending something from the ``++org.apache.struts.validator++`` package. Since you can't use the Struts validator capabilities without extending something from the ``++validator++`` package, that should always be your choice.
=== Noncompliant code example
2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00
2022-02-04 17:28:24 +01:00
[source,java]
2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00
----
public class MyForm extends org.apache.struts.action.ActionForm { // Noncompliant
// ...
----
=== Compliant solution
2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00
2022-02-04 17:28:24 +01:00
[source,java]
2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00
----
public class MyForm extends org.apache.struts.validator.ValidatorForm {
// ...
----
== Resources
2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00
* OWASP - https://owasp.org/Top10/A03_2021-Injection/[Top 10 2021 Category A3 - Injection]
* OWASP - https://owasp.org/www-project-top-ten/2017/A1_2017-Injection[Top 10 2017 Category A1 - Injection]
* OWASP - https://owasp.org/www-project-top-ten/2017/A7_2017-Cross-Site_Scripting_(XSS)[Top 10 2017 Category A7 - Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)]
* CWE - https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/104[CWE-104 - Struts: Form Bean Does Not Extend Validation Class]
ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]
'''
== Implementation Specification
(visible only on this page)
=== Message
Extend a validator class instead of "xxx".
=== Highlighting
super class name
'''
== Comments And Links
(visible only on this page)
=== on 1 Dec 2015, 11:19:01 Michael Gumowski wrote:
LGTM!
endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]