rspec/rules/S3019/comments-and-links.adoc

=== on 18 Feb 2016, 15:08:42 Nicolas Peru wrote:
This rule seems really broad. I don't see how it can bring value without way too much noise (FP).

=== on 18 Feb 2016, 19:28:01 Ann Campbell wrote:
I've added a sentence to make it explicit that the rule is about the cited methods.

=== on 18 Feb 2016, 20:56:23 Nicolas Peru wrote:
\[~ann.campbell.2] in that case I guess the example have to be updated ?

=== on 18 Feb 2016, 21:08:34 Ann Campbell wrote:
Okay. Yup.
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 18 Feb 2016, 15:08:42 Nicolas Peru wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`This rule seems really broad. I don't see how it can bring value without way too much noise (FP).`

Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 18 Feb 2016, 19:28:01 Ann Campbell wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`I've added a sentence to make it explicit that the rule is about the cited methods.`

Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 18 Feb 2016, 20:56:23 Nicolas Peru wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`\[~ann.campbell.2] in that case I guess the example have to be updated ?`

Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 18 Feb 2016, 21:08:34 Ann Campbell wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`Okay. Yup.`