rspec/rules/S1592/cobol/rule.adoc

== Why is this an issue?

When performing cursor processing, the ``++ORDER BY++`` clause not only helps to process the cursor, but it also it insures reproducibility at runtime.


ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]
'''
== Comments And Links
(visible only on this page)

include::comments-and-links.adoc[]
endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]
migrate rule descriptions to new education format 2023-05-03 11:06:20 +02:00			`== Why is this an issue?`

Restructure one-lang rspecs 2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00			When performing cursor processing, the ``++ORDER BY++`` clause not only helps to process the cursor, but it also it insures reproducibility at runtime.
Fix the missing default metadata fields 2021-04-28 18:08:03 +02:00
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]`
RULEAPI-576: add a horizontal rule between rule description and comments 2021-06-08 15:52:13 +02:00			`'''`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`== Comments And Links`
			`(visible only on this page)`

			`include::comments-and-links.adoc[]`
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]`