rspec/rules/S1593/cobol/rule.adoc

39 lines
828 B
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

== Why is this an issue?
2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00
After calling CICS commands with the ``++RESP++`` or ``++NOHANDLE++`` options, the return code should be tested.
=== Noncompliant code example
2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00
2022-02-04 17:28:24 +01:00
[source,cobol]
2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00
----
EXEC CICS DELETEQ TS *> Noncompliant; WS-STATUS should have been tested before the MOVE
QNAME(WS-TS5FTARF-NAME)
RESP(WS-STATUS)
END-EXEC.
MOVE WS-EIBTASKN (4:4) TO WS-TS5FTAR1-NAME-TSKID.
----
=== Compliant solution
2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00
2022-02-04 17:28:24 +01:00
[source,cobol]
2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00
----
EXEC CICS DELETEQ TS
QNAME(WS-TS5FTARF-NAME)
RESP(WS-STATUS)
END-EXEC.
IF WS-STATUS ...
MOVE WS-EIBTASKN (4:4) TO WS-TS5FTAR1-NAME-TSKID.
----
ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]
'''
== Comments And Links
(visible only on this page)
include::comments-and-links.adoc[]
endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]