rspec/rules/S1873/rule.adoc

69 lines
1.7 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

== Why is this an issue?
Public arrays, even ones declared ``++static final++`` can have their contents edited by malicious programs. The ``++final++`` keyword on an array declaration means that the array object itself may only be assigned once, but its contents are still mutable. Therefore making arrays ``++public++`` is a security risk.
2021-02-02 15:02:10 +01:00
Instead, arrays should be private and accessed through methods.
=== Noncompliant code example
2022-02-04 17:28:24 +01:00
[source,text]
----
public class Estate {
// Noncompliant; array contents can be modified
public static final String [] HEIRS = new String [] {
"Betty", "Suzy" };
}
public class Malicious {
public void changeWill() {
Estate.HEIRS[0] = "Biff";
if (Estate.HEIRS.length > 1) {
for (int i = 1; i < Estate.HEIRS.length; i++) {
Estate.HEIRS[i] = "";
}
}
}
----
=== Compliant solution
2022-02-04 17:28:24 +01:00
[source,text]
----
public class Estate {
private static final String [] HEIRS = new String [] {
"Betty", "Suzy" };
public String [] getHeirs() {
// return copy of HEIRS
}
}
----
== Resources
* https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/582[MITRE, CWE-582] - Array Declared Public, Final, and Static
* https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/607[MITRE, CWE-607] - Public Static Final Field References Mutable Object
* https://wiki.sei.cmu.edu/confluence/x/LjdGBQ[CERT, OBJ01-J.] - Limit accessibility of fields
* https://wiki.sei.cmu.edu/confluence/x/VzZGBQ[CERT, OBJ13-J.] - Ensure that references to mutable objects are not exposed
2022-01-25 18:36:46 +01:00
ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]
'''
== Implementation Specification
(visible only on this page)
include::message.adoc[]
'''
== Comments And Links
(visible only on this page)
include::comments-and-links.adoc[]
endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]