rspec/rules/S2317/python/rule.adoc

36 lines
636 B
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

== Why is this an issue?
2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00
Use of the ``++exec++`` statement could be dangerous, and should be avoided. Moreover, the ``++exec++`` statement was removed in Python 3.0. Instead, the built-in ``++exec()++`` function can be used.
=== Noncompliant code example
2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00
2022-02-04 17:28:24 +01:00
[source,python]
2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00
----
exec 'print 1' # Noncompliant
----
=== Compliant solution
2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00
2022-02-04 17:28:24 +01:00
[source,python]
2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00
----
exec('print 1')
----
ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]
'''
== Implementation Specification
(visible only on this page)
include::message.adoc[]
'''
== Comments And Links
(visible only on this page)
include::comments-and-links.adoc[]
endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]