rspec/rules/S2698/java/comments-and-links.adoc

=== on 9 Apr 2015, 07:48:54 Nicolas Peru wrote:
\[~ann.campbell.2] I think we should we also cover FestAssertions in this rule (which we use a lot internally, like more (instead of?) Junit assertions).

=== on 9 Apr 2015, 13:03:39 Ann Campbell wrote:
how's that?

=== on 9 Apr 2015, 13:14:05 Nicolas Peru wrote:
Looks good.

=== on 26 May 2020, 15:44:14 Johann Beleites wrote:
This rule appears extremely noisy for AssertJ (and potentially Fest?) - consider twice before putting it into the default profile.
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 9 Apr 2015, 07:48:54 Nicolas Peru wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`\[~ann.campbell.2] I think we should we also cover FestAssertions in this rule (which we use a lot internally, like more (instead of?) Junit assertions).`

Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 9 Apr 2015, 13:03:39 Ann Campbell wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`how's that?`

Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 9 Apr 2015, 13:14:05 Nicolas Peru wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`Looks good.`

Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 26 May 2020, 15:44:14 Johann Beleites wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`This rule appears extremely noisy for AssertJ (and potentially Fest?) - consider twice before putting it into the default profile.`