rspec/rules/S3345/java/comments-and-links.adoc

=== on 17 Sep 2015, 09:27:10 Ann Campbell wrote:
source: \https://twitter.com/CyrilP_tweet/status/644432004340150272?cn=cmVwbHk%3D&refsrc=email

=== on 14 Sep 2016, 08:12:35 Ann Campbell wrote:
From \https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sonarqube/YGMsyzSkeQk:

In the past we've used a PMD XPath rule that looks like this "//MethodDeclaration//PrimaryExpression/PrimaryPrefix/Name[@Image='JAXBContext.newInstance'][ancestor::ClassOrInterfaceBodyDeclaration/Annotation/descendant::Name[contains(@Image,'SCOPE_PROTOTYPE')] or not(ancestor::ClassOrInterfaceBodyDeclaration/Annotation/descendant::Name[@Image='Bean'])]"
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 17 Sep 2015, 09:27:10 Ann Campbell wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`source: \https://twitter.com/CyrilP_tweet/status/644432004340150272?cn=cmVwbHk%3D&refsrc=email`

Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 14 Sep 2016, 08:12:35 Ann Campbell wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`From \https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sonarqube/YGMsyzSkeQk:`

			`In the past we've used a PMD XPath rule that looks like this "//MethodDeclaration//PrimaryExpression/PrimaryPrefix/Name[@Image='JAXBContext.newInstance'][ancestor::ClassOrInterfaceBodyDeclaration/Annotation/descendant::Name[contains(@Image,'SCOPE_PROTOTYPE')] or not(ancestor::ClassOrInterfaceBodyDeclaration/Annotation/descendant::Name[@Image='Bean'])]"`