rspec/rules/S3442/csharp/comments-and-links.adoc

=== on 8 Dec 2015, 08:48:44 Tamas Vajk wrote:
\[~ann.campbell.2] LGTM, changed the label from api-design to clumsy. The constructor can't be called directly, because it's in an ``++abstract++`` class. So we can only call it from a deriving type's constructor, but this is also the case if the constructor is ``++protected++``, so we are not proposing any real change in api-design. WDYT?

=== on 12 Apr 2016, 17:56:27 Ann Campbell wrote:
Rule originally taken from R#, but also exists in MSFT Roslyn rule set & therefore doesn't need re-implementation.

=== on 26 Jan 2017, 16:49:21 Ann Campbell wrote:
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms182126.aspx
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 8 Dec 2015, 08:48:44 Tamas Vajk wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			\[~ann.campbell.2] LGTM, changed the label from api-design to clumsy. The constructor can't be called directly, because it's in an ``++abstract++`` class. So we can only call it from a deriving type's constructor, but this is also the case if the constructor is ``++protected++``, so we are not proposing any real change in api-design. WDYT?

Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 12 Apr 2016, 17:56:27 Ann Campbell wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`Rule originally taken from R#, but also exists in MSFT Roslyn rule set & therefore doesn't need re-implementation.`

Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 26 Jan 2017, 16:49:21 Ann Campbell wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms182126.aspx`