rspec/rules/S3696/javascript/rule.adoc

It is a bad practice to `+throw+` something that's not derived at some level from `+Error+`. If you can't find an existing `+Error+` type that suitably conveys what you need to convey, then you should extend `+Error+` to create one.

Specifically, part of the point of throwing \`+Error+`s is to communicate about the conditions of the error, but literals have far less ability to communicate meaningfully than \`+Error+`s because they don't include stacktraces.

== Noncompliant Code Example

----
throw 404;                              // Noncompliant
throw "Invalid negative index.";        // Noncompliant
----

== Compliant Solution

----
throw new Error("Status: " + 404);
throw new Error("Invalid negative index.");{code}
----

include::../see.adoc[]