2023-05-03 11:06:20 +02:00
== Why is this an issue?
2020-06-30 10:16:44 +02:00
include::../description.adoc[]
2023-05-03 11:06:20 +02:00
=== Noncompliant code example
2020-06-30 10:16:44 +02:00
With a maximum number of 4 parameters:
2020-06-30 14:49:38 +02:00
2022-02-04 17:28:24 +01:00
[source,java]
2020-06-30 10:16:44 +02:00
----
public void doSomething(int param1, int param2, int param3, String param4, long param5) {
...
}
----
2023-05-03 11:06:20 +02:00
=== Compliant solution
2020-06-30 10:16:44 +02:00
2022-02-04 17:28:24 +01:00
[source,java]
2020-06-30 10:16:44 +02:00
----
public void doSomething(int param1, int param2, int param3, String param4) {
...
}
----
2023-05-03 11:06:20 +02:00
=== Exceptions
2020-06-30 10:16:44 +02:00
2020-12-21 15:38:52 +01:00
Methods annotated with :
2021-01-27 13:42:22 +01:00
* Spring's ``++@RequestMapping++`` (and related shortcut annotations, like ``++@GetRequest++``)
* JAX-RS API annotations (like ``++@javax.ws.rs.GET++``)
* Bean constructor injection with ``++@org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Autowired++``
* CDI constructor injection with ``++@javax.inject.Inject++``
* ``++@com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonCreator++``
2022-10-24 14:51:00 +02:00
* Micronaut's annotations (like ``++@io.micronaut.http.annotation.Get++``)
2020-12-21 15:38:52 +01:00
may have a lot of parameters, encapsulation being possible. Such methods are therefore ignored.
2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00
2022-10-24 14:51:00 +02:00
Also, if a class annotated as a Spring component (like ``++@org.springframework.stereotype.Component++``) has a single
constructor, that constructor will be considered ``++@Autowired++`` and ignored by the rule.
2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00
ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]
2021-09-20 15:38:42 +02:00
'''
== Implementation Specification
(visible only on this page)
include::../message.adoc[]
include::../parameters.adoc[]
2021-06-08 15:52:13 +02:00
'''
2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00
== Comments And Links
(visible only on this page)
2023-05-25 14:18:12 +02:00
=== on 25 Oct 2018, 00:04:10 Vishal Mirza wrote:
!RequestMapping Annotation Not Ignored.png!
Hi,
I have been using the SonarJava 5.8 updated plugin and I still see RequestMapping annotation is not being ignored by SonarQube. Attached is the image of code snippet(sorry I have to hide the names due to the company policies). Can someone tell me how to make it work?
Thanks
=== on 25 Oct 2018, 16:01:54 Ann Campbell wrote:
\[~vishal.mirza] to start a discussion, please go to the https://community.sonarsource.com[SonarQube Community]
include::../comments-and-links.adoc[]
2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00
endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]