rspec/rules/S2589/comments-and-links.adoc

=== deprecates: S1850

=== is related to: S3650

=== relates to: S1764

=== on 1 Feb 2016, 10:21:45 Freddy Mallet wrote:
Question : should we consider this RSPEC as being fully a subset of RSPEC-2583 ? I think the only motivation behind this split was to use a different severity and this remains a relevant point. 

=== on 29 Feb 2016, 08:37:04 Pierre-Yves Nicolas wrote:
\[~freddy.mallet] I don't really see why this RSPEC is "fully a subset of RSPEC-2583". Maybe that makes sense if it is implemented through symbolic execution with short-circuit logical operators, but then it all depends on the order of sub-conditions. Please consider ``++IF X > 1 AND X = 5++``: I think that this code would raise an issue for the current description of this RSPEC, but not for RSPEC-2583.
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== deprecates: S1850`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== is related to: S3650`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== relates to: S1764`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 1 Feb 2016, 10:21:45 Freddy Mallet wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`Question : should we consider this RSPEC as being fully a subset of RSPEC-2583 ? I think the only motivation behind this split was to use a different severity and this remains a relevant point.`

Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 29 Feb 2016, 08:37:04 Pierre-Yves Nicolas wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			\[~freddy.mallet] I don't really see why this RSPEC is "fully a subset of RSPEC-2583". Maybe that makes sense if it is implemented through symbolic execution with short-circuit logical operators, but then it all depends on the order of sub-conditions. Please consider ``++IF X > 1 AND X = 5++``: I think that this code would raise an issue for the current description of this RSPEC, but not for RSPEC-2583.