rspec/rules/S6212/java/rule.adoc

In Java 10 https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/286[Local-Variable Type Inference] was introduced. It allows you to omit the expected type of a variable by declaring it with the ``++var++`` keyword. 

While it is not always possible or cleaner to use this new way of declaring a variable, when the type on the left is the same as the one on the right in an assignment, using the ``++var++`` will result in a more concise code.


This rule reports an issue when the expected type of the variable is the same as the returned type of assigned expression.


== Noncompliant Code Example

----
MyClass myClass = new MyClass();
----


== Compliant Solution

----
var myClass = new MyClass();
----


== See

* https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/286[JEP 286: Local-Variable Type Inference]