rspec/rules/S1110/abap/rule.adoc

== Why is this an issue?

include::../description.adoc[]

=== Noncompliant code example

[source,abap]
----
 CHECK (SY-SUBRC NE 0). "compliant even if ignored by compiler
 IF ((SY-SUBRC EQ 0)). "Noncompliant
----

=== Compliant solution

[source,abap]
----
 CHECK (SY-SUBRC NE 0).
 IF (SY-SUBRC EQ 0). 
----

include::../rspecator.adoc[]
migrate rule descriptions to new education format 2023-05-03 11:06:20 +02:00			`== Why is this an issue?`

Add rules 1000-1999 2020-06-30 12:47:33 +02:00			`include::../description.adoc[]`

migrate rule descriptions to new education format 2023-05-03 11:06:20 +02:00			`=== Noncompliant code example`
Add rules 1000-1999 2020-06-30 12:47:33 +02:00
RULEAPI-661: Add syntax coloring 2022-02-04 17:28:24 +01:00			`[source,abap]`
Add rules 1000-1999 2020-06-30 12:47:33 +02:00			`----`
			`CHECK (SY-SUBRC NE 0). "compliant even if ignored by compiler`
			`IF ((SY-SUBRC EQ 0)). "Noncompliant`
			`----`

migrate rule descriptions to new education format 2023-05-03 11:06:20 +02:00			`=== Compliant solution`
Add rules 1000-1999 2020-06-30 12:47:33 +02:00
RULEAPI-661: Add syntax coloring 2022-02-04 17:28:24 +01:00			`[source,abap]`
Add rules 1000-1999 2020-06-30 12:47:33 +02:00			`----`
			`CHECK (SY-SUBRC NE 0).`
			`IF (SY-SUBRC EQ 0).`
			`----`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00
Modify rule S1110: Update dotnet part of the rule to LayC (#2214) 2023-06-16 11:18:11 +02:00			`include::../rspecator.adoc[]`