rspec/rules/S2187/comments-and-links.adoc

=== replaces: S2700

=== on 24 Nov 2014, 19:28:35 Nicolas Peru wrote:
\[~ann.campbell.2]What does "without any tests" means ? is that for classes without any test methods ? or is it tests without asserts ? This rule seems to lack some example.

=== on 1 Dec 2014, 17:24:44 Ann Campbell wrote:
\[~nicolas.peru] I meant without tests. WDYT, should this rule require both?

=== on 4 Dec 2014, 18:38:16 Ann Campbell wrote:
\[~nicolas.peru] I just realized I answered your question by repeating what you asked about. Sorry.


I meant test methods.
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== replaces: S2700`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 24 Nov 2014, 19:28:35 Nicolas Peru wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`\[~ann.campbell.2]What does "without any tests" means ? is that for classes without any test methods ? or is it tests without asserts ? This rule seems to lack some example.`

Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 1 Dec 2014, 17:24:44 Ann Campbell wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`\[~nicolas.peru] I meant without tests. WDYT, should this rule require both?`

Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 4 Dec 2014, 18:38:16 Ann Campbell wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`\[~nicolas.peru] I just realized I answered your question by repeating what you asked about. Sorry.`


			`I meant test methods.`