rspec/rules/S2357/comments-and-links.adoc

=== is related to: S1104

=== on 27 May 2015, 18:40:54 Ann Campbell wrote:
\[~tamas.vajk] I added C# to the targeted list without further editing in response to SONARCSANA-106. You may want to check the rule description over.

=== on 28 May 2015, 06:43:52 Tamas Vajk wrote:
\[~ann.campbell.2] shouldn't we have an exception for constant fields? And how about static ones? Those can't be part of an interface, so the reasoning doesn't apply to them.


For static ones, we have another rule with a different reasoning: \http://jira.sonarsource.com/browse/RSPEC-2223

=== on 28 May 2015, 11:26:31 Ann Campbell wrote:
\[~tamas.vajk] do you have any idea if those exceptions should apply to VB.NET too?

=== on 28 May 2015, 11:43:48 Tamas Vajk wrote:
\[~ann.campbell.2] Yes, this applies to VB.Net as well. There ``++static++`` is called ``++Shared++``, and constant variables are marked by ``++Const++``

=== on 29 May 2015, 12:31:40 Ann Campbell wrote:
double-check me please, [~tamas.vajk]


=== on 8 Jun 2015, 08:42:51 Tamas Vajk wrote:
LGTM
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== is related to: S1104`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 27 May 2015, 18:40:54 Ann Campbell wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`\[~tamas.vajk] I added C# to the targeted list without further editing in response to SONARCSANA-106. You may want to check the rule description over.`

Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 28 May 2015, 06:43:52 Tamas Vajk wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`\[~ann.campbell.2] shouldn't we have an exception for constant fields? And how about static ones? Those can't be part of an interface, so the reasoning doesn't apply to them.`


			`For static ones, we have another rule with a different reasoning: \http://jira.sonarsource.com/browse/RSPEC-2223`

Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 28 May 2015, 11:26:31 Ann Campbell wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`\[~tamas.vajk] do you have any idea if those exceptions should apply to VB.NET too?`

Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 28 May 2015, 11:43:48 Tamas Vajk wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			\[~ann.campbell.2] Yes, this applies to VB.Net as well. There ``++static++`` is called ``++Shared++``, and constant variables are marked by ``++Const++``

Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 29 May 2015, 12:31:40 Ann Campbell wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`double-check me please, [~tamas.vajk]`



Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 8 Jun 2015, 08:42:51 Tamas Vajk wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`LGTM`