rspec/rules/S4586/comments-and-links.adoc

=== on 16 Apr 2018, 15:00:41 Amaury Levé wrote:
\[~ann.campbell.2] Could you please review?

=== on 17 Apr 2018, 21:43:26 Ann Campbell wrote:
\[~amaury.leve] I'm confused. The title says "in a method *not* marked as async" and the description talks about "Returning ``++null++`` from a *non*-``++async++``".


Also, this title doesn't follow the format: X should [not] Y

=== on 18 Apr 2018, 09:30:40 Amaury Levé wrote:
Thank you for the review. Does it looks better now?

=== on 18 Apr 2018, 13:43:19 Ann Campbell wrote:
Yes, looks good [~amaury.leve]
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 16 Apr 2018, 15:00:41 Amaury Levé wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`\[~ann.campbell.2] Could you please review?`

Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 17 Apr 2018, 21:43:26 Ann Campbell wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			\[~amaury.leve] I'm confused. The title says "in a method not marked as async" and the description talks about "Returning ``++null++`` from a non-``++async++``".


			`Also, this title doesn't follow the format: X should [not] Y`

Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 18 Apr 2018, 09:30:40 Amaury Levé wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`Thank you for the review. Does it looks better now?`

Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 18 Apr 2018, 13:43:19 Ann Campbell wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`Yes, looks good [~amaury.leve]`