rspec/rules/S2822/python/rule.adoc

== Why is this an issue?

A class without an explicit extension of object (``++class ClassName(object)++``) is considered an old-style class, and ``++__slots__++`` declarations are ignored in old-style classes. Having such a declaration in an old-style class could be confusing for maintainers and lead them to make false assumptions about the class.


=== Noncompliant code example

[source,python]
----
class A:
  __slots__ = ["id"]  # Noncompliant; this is ignored

  def __init__(self):
    self.id = id
    self.name = "name"  # name wasn't declared in __slots__ but there's no error

a = A()
----


=== Compliant solution

[source,python]
----
class A(object):  # Converting to a new-style class is the preferred method of addressing this issue
  __slots__ = ["id"]

  def __init__(self):
    self.id = id
    self.name = "name"  # "name" is not listed in __slots__, so as expected there is an error in this line

a = A()
----
or

[source,python]
----
class A:

  def __init__(self):
    self.id = id
    self.name = "name"

a = A()
----

ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]

'''
== Implementation Specification
(visible only on this page)

include::message.adoc[]

endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]