rspec/rules/S3864/java/comments-and-links.adoc

=== on 4 Jan 2021, 17:52:38 Sebastien Lesaint wrote:
Hi,


I got a notification of a change on this ticket and reread the description.


This made me realize that the example is misleading in the same way the description text was: it's focused on the missing terminal operation, which is the scope of https://rules.sonarsource.com/java/RSPEC-3958, not of this rule.


I don't have an example to suggest, nothing obvious comes to my mind. Which leads me to wonder whether the difficulty of finding an example could be a smell of the rule being a bit fragile...
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 4 Jan 2021, 17:52:38 Sebastien Lesaint wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`Hi,`


			`I got a notification of a change on this ticket and reread the description.`


			`This made me realize that the example is misleading in the same way the description text was: it's focused on the missing terminal operation, which is the scope of https://rules.sonarsource.com/java/RSPEC-3958, not of this rule.`


			`I don't have an example to suggest, nothing obvious comes to my mind. Which leads me to wonder whether the difficulty of finding an example could be a smell of the rule being a bit fragile...`