Create rule S7447: File open options should be consistent (#4791)

* Create rule S7447

* Update RSPEC

---------

Co-authored-by: yassin-kammoun-sonarsource <yassin-kammoun-sonarsource@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: yassin-kammoun-sonarsource <yassin.kammoun@sonarsource.com>

rules/S7447/metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+{
+}

rules/S7447/rust/metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+{
+  "title": "File open options should be consistent",
+  "type": "BUG",
+  "status": "ready",
+  "remediation": {
+    "func": "Constant\/Issue",
+    "constantCost": "5min"
+  },
+  "tags": [
+    "clippy"
+  ],
+  "defaultSeverity": "Major",
+  "ruleSpecification": "RSPEC-7447",
+  "sqKey": "S7447",
+  "scope": "All",
+  "defaultQualityProfiles": ["Sonar way"],
+  "quickfix": "unknown",
+  "code": {
+    "impacts": {
+      "RELIABILITY": "HIGH"
+    },
+    "attribute": "LOGICAL"
+  }
+}

rules/S7447/rust/rule.adoc

@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+== Why is this an issue?
+
+Using contradictory or nonsensical combinations of file open options, such as `read(true)` with `truncate(true)`, can lead to code that is confusing and harder to read. In some cases, it can result in runtime errors or undefined behavior, potentially causing data corruption or loss.
+
+=== Code examples
+
+==== Noncompliant code example
+
+[source,rust,diff-id=1,diff-type=noncompliant]
+----
+use std::fs::OpenOptions;
+
+OpenOptions::new().read(true).truncate(true); // Noncompliant: Invalid combination of file open options.
+----
+
+==== Compliant solution
+
+[source,rust,diff-id=1,diff-type=compliant]
+----
+use std::fs::OpenOptions;
+
+OpenOptions::new().write(true).truncate(true); // Compliant: Valid combination of file open options.
+----
+
+== Resources
+=== Documentation
+
+* Clippy Lints - https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#nonsensical_open_options