From 42d04dee44d7456fc80b1b362b045ec69a872b2d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dorian Burihabwa
 <75226315+dorian-burihabwa-sonarsource@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 18:25:24 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Modify rule S6210: Rephrase requirement on private element
 access (#213)

---
 rules/S6210/java/rule.adoc | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/rules/S6210/java/rule.adoc b/rules/S6210/java/rule.adoc
index a708fd49d5..ecd6bc3403 100644
--- a/rules/S6210/java/rule.adoc
+++ b/rules/S6210/java/rule.adoc
@@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ A compact constructor doesn't have parameters defined explicitly, parentheses ar
 
 This rule reports an issue when a canonical constructor can be easily replaced by a compact version when these requirements are met:
 
-* the last statements are trivial field initialization
-* besides this, there is no access to private members through ``++this++``
+* the last statements are trivial field initializations
+* no statement reads from fields or components
 * there are other statements in the constructor (case covered by S6207: redundant constructors in records)