diff --git a/docs/header_names/allowed_framework_names.adoc b/docs/header_names/allowed_framework_names.adoc
index d3d0ea4b62..550dbc7d80 100644
--- a/docs/header_names/allowed_framework_names.adoc
+++ b/docs/header_names/allowed_framework_names.adoc
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
 * Java JWT
 * Java SE
 * Java JDBC API
+* Java I/O API
 * Jdom2
 * JSP
 * Legacy Mongo Java API
diff --git a/rules/S2083/java/how-to-fix-it/java-se.adoc b/rules/S2083/java/how-to-fix-it/java-io-api.adoc
similarity index 95%
rename from rules/S2083/java/how-to-fix-it/java-se.adoc
rename to rules/S2083/java/how-to-fix-it/java-io-api.adoc
index ac8607bc2b..732f944ecf 100644
--- a/rules/S2083/java/how-to-fix-it/java-se.adoc
+++ b/rules/S2083/java/how-to-fix-it/java-io-api.adoc
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-== How to fix it in Java SE
+== How to fix it in Java I/O API
 
 === Code examples
 
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ that the string `targetDirectory` does not end with a path separator:
 static private String targetDirectory = "/Users/John";
 
 @GetMapping(value = "/endpoint")
-public void endpoint(@RequestParam("folder") fileName) throws IOException {
+public void endpoint(@RequestParam("folder") File fileName) throws IOException {
 
     String canonicalizedFileName = fileName.getCanonicalPath();
 
diff --git a/rules/S2083/java/rule.adoc b/rules/S2083/java/rule.adoc
index 3a6722bf87..cb4bcf6019 100644
--- a/rules/S2083/java/rule.adoc
+++ b/rules/S2083/java/rule.adoc
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ include::../impact.adoc[]
 
 // How to fix it section
 
-include::how-to-fix-it/java-se.adoc[]
+include::how-to-fix-it/java-io-api.adoc[]
 
 == Resources
 
diff --git a/rules/S2083/kotlin/how-to-fix-it/java-io-api.adoc b/rules/S2083/kotlin/how-to-fix-it/java-io-api.adoc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..bb31872afb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/rules/S2083/kotlin/how-to-fix-it/java-io-api.adoc
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+== How to fix it in Java I/O API
+
+=== Code examples
+
+:code_impact: delete
+
+include::../../common/fix/code-rationale.adoc[]
+
+==== Noncompliant code example
+
+[source,kotlin,diff-id=1,diff-type=noncompliant]
+----
+@Controller
+class ExampleController {
+    companion object {
+        private const val TARGET_DIRECTORY = "/path/to/target/directory/"
+    }
+
+    @GetMapping("/delete")
+    fun delete(@RequestParam("filename") filename: String) {
+        val file = File(TARGET_DIRECTORY + filename)
+        file.delete()
+    }
+}
+----
+
+==== Compliant solution
+
+[source,kotlin,diff-id=1,diff-type=compliant]
+----
+@Controller
+class ExampleController {
+    companion object {
+        private const val TARGET_DIRECTORY = "/path/to/target/directory/"
+        private val TARGET_PATH = File(TARGET_DIRECTORY).toPath().normalize()
+    }
+
+    @GetMapping("/delete")
+    fun delete(@RequestParam("filename") filename: String) {
+        val file = File(TARGET_PATH.toString() + filename)
+        if (!file.toPath().normalize().startsWith(TARGET_PATH)) {
+            throw IOException("Entry is outside of the target directory")
+        }
+        file.delete()
+    }
+}
+----
+
+=== How does this work?
+
+:canonicalization_function: java.io.File.getCanonicalPath
+
+include::../../common/fix/self-validation.adoc[]
+
+=== Pitfalls
+
+include::../../common/pitfalls/partial-path-traversal.adoc[]
+
+For example, the following code is vulnerable to partial path injection. Note
+that the string `targetDirectory` does not end with a path separator:
+
+
+[source, kotlin]
+----
+companion object {
+    private val targetDirectory: String = "/Users/John"
+}
+
+@GetMapping("/endpoint")
+fun endpoint(@RequestParam("folder") file: File) {
+    val canonicalizedFileName = file.getCanonicalPath()
+    if (!canonicalizedFileName .startsWith(targetDirectory)) {
+        throw IOException("Entry is outside of the target directory");
+    }
+    file.delete()
+}
+----
+
+This check can be bypassed because `"/Users/Johnny".startsWith("/Users/John")`
+returns `true`. Thus, for validation, `"/Users/John"` should actually be
+`"/Users/John/"`.
+
+**Warning**: Some functions, such as `.getCanonicalPath`, remove the
+terminating path separator in their return value. +
+The validation code should be tested to ensure that it cannot be impacted by this
+issue.
+
+https://github.com/aws/aws-sdk-java/security/advisories/GHSA-c28r-hw5m-5gv3[Here is a real-life example of this vulnerability.]
+
+
+:joining_docs: https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/java/nio/file/Path.html
+:joining_func: java.nio.file.Path.resolve
+
+include::../../common/pitfalls/oob-specific-path-joining.adoc[]
diff --git a/rules/S2083/kotlin/metadata.json b/rules/S2083/kotlin/metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..97202b93c7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/rules/S2083/kotlin/metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+{
+  "securityStandards": {
+    "CWE": [
+      20,
+      22
+    ],
+    "OWASP": [
+      "A5",
+      "A1"
+    ],
+    "OWASP Top 10 2021": [
+      "A1",
+      "A3"
+    ],
+    "OWASP Mobile Top 10 2024": [
+      "M4"
+    ],
+    "PCI DSS 3.2": [
+      "6.5.8"
+    ],
+    "PCI DSS 4.0": [
+      "6.2.4"
+    ],
+    "ASVS 4.0": [
+      "12.3.1",
+      "5.1.3",
+      "5.1.4"
+    ],
+    "STIG ASD_V5R3": [
+      "V-222609"
+    ]
+  }
+}
diff --git a/rules/S2083/kotlin/rule.adoc b/rules/S2083/kotlin/rule.adoc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..cb4bcf6019
--- /dev/null
+++ b/rules/S2083/kotlin/rule.adoc
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+== Why is this an issue?
+
+include::../rationale.adoc[]
+
+include::../impact.adoc[]
+
+// How to fix it section
+
+include::how-to-fix-it/java-io-api.adoc[]
+
+== Resources
+
+include::../common/resources/standards-mobile.adoc[]
+
+ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]
+
+'''
+== Implementation Specification
+(visible only on this page)
+
+include::../message.adoc[]
+
+'''
+== Comments And Links
+(visible only on this page)
+
+include::../comments-and-links.adoc[]
+
+endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]