Create rule S7432: Reversed ranges and slices should not be empty (#4773)

* Create rule S7432

* Update RSPEC

---------

Co-authored-by: yassin-kammoun-sonarsource <yassin-kammoun-sonarsource@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: yassin-kammoun-sonarsource <yassin.kammoun@sonarsource.com>

rules/S7432/metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+{
+}

rules/S7432/rust/metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+{
+  "title": "Reversed ranges and slices should not be empty",
+  "type": "BUG",
+  "status": "ready",
+  "remediation": {
+    "func": "Constant\/Issue",
+    "constantCost": "5min"
+  },
+  "tags": [
+    "clippy"
+  ],
+  "defaultSeverity": "Major",
+  "ruleSpecification": "RSPEC-7432",
+  "sqKey": "S7432",
+  "scope": "All",
+  "defaultQualityProfiles": ["Sonar way"],
+  "quickfix": "unknown",
+  "code": {
+    "impacts": {
+      "RELIABILITY": "MEDIUM"
+    },
+    "attribute": "LOGICAL"
+  }
+}

rules/S7432/rust/rule.adoc

@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+== Why is this an issue?
+
+Empty ranges result in no iterations, making any loop a no-op. Trying to index slices using reversed ranges will result in runtime panics. Both scenarios lead to bugs or logical errors in the code.
+
+=== Code examples
+
+==== Noncompliant code example
+
+[source,rust,diff-id=1,diff-type=noncompliant]
+----
+fn main() {
+    (10..=0).for_each(|x| println!("{}", x)); // Noncompliant: Empty range
+    let arr = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5];
+    let sub = &arr[3..1]; // Noncompliant: Reversed slice indexing
+}
+----
+
+==== Compliant solution
+
+[source,rust,diff-id=1,diff-type=compliant]
+----
+fn main() {
+    (0..=10).rev().for_each(|x| println!("{}", x)); // Compliant: Properly reversed range for iteration
+    let arr = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5];
+    let sub = &arr[1..3]; // Compliant: Valid slice indexing
+}
+----
+
+== Resources
+=== Documentation
+
+* Clippy Lints - https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#reversed_empty_ranges