Create rule S7424 Avoid manual PartialEq implementation with a derived Hash (#4765)

* Create rule S7424

* Update rule.adoc

* Update metadata.json

---------

Co-authored-by: sallaigy <sallaigy@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Gyula Sallai <gyula.sallai@sonarsource.com>

rules/S7424/metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+{
+}

rules/S7424/rust/metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+{
+  "title": "Avoid manual PartialEq implementation with a derived Hash",
+  "type": "BUG",
+  "status": "ready",
+  "remediation": {
+    "func": "Constant\/Issue",
+    "constantCost": "5min"
+  },
+  "tags": [
+    "clippy"
+  ],
+  "defaultSeverity": "Critical",
+  "ruleSpecification": "RSPEC-7424",
+  "sqKey": "S7424",
+  "scope": "All",
+  "defaultQualityProfiles": ["Sonar way"],
+  "quickfix": "unknown",
+  "code": {
+    "impacts": {
+      "RELIABILITY": "HIGH"
+    },
+    "attribute": "LOGICAL"
+  }
+}

rules/S7424/rust/rule.adoc

@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+
+== Why is this an issue?
+Having a manual `PartialEq` implementation for types with a derived `Hash` can lead to inconsistencies. The contract `k1 == k2 ⇒ hash(k1) == hash(k2)` must always hold. Inconsistencies can cause undefined behaviors, especially when these types are used in collections such as `HashMap`.
+
+
+=== Code examples
+
+==== Noncompliant code example
+[source,rust,diff-id=1,diff-type=noncompliant]
+----
+#[derive(Hash)]
+struct Foo;
+
+impl PartialEq for Foo {
+    fn eq(&self, other: &Self) -> bool {
+        // Some custom equality logic
+        true // Noncompliant
+    }
+}
+----
+
+==== Compliant solution
+
+[source,rust,diff-id=1,diff-type=compliant]
+----
+#[derive(Hash, PartialEq)]
+struct Foo;
+----
+
+== Resources
+=== Documentation
+
+* Clippy Lints - https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#derived_hash_with_manual_eq