Modify rule S6206: "no setters" condition is redundant with having only private final fields

This commit is contained in:
Michael Gumowski 2021-07-07 10:53:41 +02:00
parent 8748b36ee1
commit cdd4eee00b

View File

@ -9,7 +9,6 @@ This rule reports an issue on classes for which all these statements are true:
* all instance fields are private and final
* has only one constructor with a parameter for all fields
* has getters for all fields
* has no setters
== Noncompliant Code Example