Create rule S7449 The #[inline] attribute should not be used on trait methods without implementation (#4793)

* Create rule S7449

* Update metadata.json

* Update rule.adoc

* Update rule.adoc

* Update rule.adoc

* Update metadata.json

---------

Co-authored-by: sallaigy <sallaigy@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Gyula Sallai <gyula.sallai@sonarsource.com>

rules/S7449/metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+{
+}

rules/S7449/rust/metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+{
+  "title": "The `#[inline]` attribute should not be used on trait methods without implementation",
+  "type": "BUG",
+  "status": "ready",
+  "remediation": {
+    "func": "Constant\/Issue",
+    "constantCost": "5min"
+  },
+  "tags": [
+    "clippy"
+  ],
+  "defaultSeverity": "Critical",
+  "ruleSpecification": "RSPEC-7449",
+  "sqKey": "S7449",
+  "scope": "All",
+  "defaultQualityProfiles": ["Sonar way"],
+  "quickfix": "unknown",
+  "code": {
+    "impacts": {
+      "RELIABILITY": "HIGH"
+    },
+    "attribute": "LOGICAL"
+  }
+}

rules/S7449/rust/rule.adoc

@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+
+== Why is this an issue?
+Applying the `#[inline]` attribute to trait methods without provided implementations is pointless because only method implementations can be inlined. The attribute is therefore ignored in such cases, leading to unnecessary code complexity.
+
+
+=== Code examples
+
+==== Noncompliant code example
+[source,rust,diff-id=1,diff-type=noncompliant]
+----
+trait Animal {
+    #[inline] // Noncompliant: Inline attribute on trait method without implementation.
+    fn name(&self) -> &'static str;
+}
+----
+
+==== Compliant solution
+
+[source,rust,diff-id=1,diff-type=compliant]
+----
+trait Animal {
+    fn name(&self) -> &'static str;
+}
+----
+
+== Resources
+=== Documentation
+
+* Clippy Lints - https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#inline_fn_without_body