Nightly update

This commit is contained in:
sonartech 2021-04-28 01:15:15 +00:00
parent 26b18d5d09
commit dfc955af1e
11 changed files with 42 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -2,6 +2,10 @@
"title": "Meta tags should not be used to refresh or redirect",
"type": "CODE_SMELL",
"status": "ready",
"remediation": {
"func": "Constant\/Issue",
"constantCost": "20min"
},
"tags": [
"user-experience"
],

View File

@ -2,6 +2,10 @@
"title": "\"<title>\" should be present in all pages",
"type": "BUG",
"status": "ready",
"remediation": {
"func": "Constant\/Issue",
"constantCost": "5min"
},
"tags": [
"user-experience"
],

View File

@ -2,6 +2,10 @@
"title": "Favicons should be used in all pages",
"type": "CODE_SMELL",
"status": "ready",
"remediation": {
"func": "Constant\/Issue",
"constantCost": "5min"
},
"tags": [
"user-experience"
],

View File

@ -2,6 +2,10 @@
"title": "Track lack of required child elements",
"type": "CODE_SMELL",
"status": "ready",
"remediation": {
"func": "Constant\/Issue",
"constantCost": "5min"
},
"tags": [
],

View File

@ -2,6 +2,10 @@
"title": "Function parameters' default values should not be modified or assigned",
"type": "CODE_SMELL",
"status": "ready",
"remediation": {
"func": "Constant\/Issue",
"constantCost": "5min"
},
"tags": [
],

View File

@ -2,6 +2,10 @@
"title": "Instance and class methods should have at least one positional parameter",
"type": "BUG",
"status": "ready",
"remediation": {
"func": "Constant\/Issue",
"constantCost": "5min"
},
"tags": [
],

View File

@ -2,6 +2,10 @@
"title": "Assertion methods should not be used within the try block of a try-catch catching an Error",
"type": "BUG",
"status": "ready",
"remediation": {
"func": "Constant\/Issue",
"constantCost": "5min"
},
"tags": [
"tests"
],

View File

@ -2,6 +2,10 @@
"title": "Only one method invocation is expected when testing checked exceptions",
"type": "BUG",
"status": "ready",
"remediation": {
"func": "Constant\/Issue",
"constantCost": "5min"
},
"tags": [
"tests"
],

View File

@ -2,6 +2,10 @@
"title": "JUnit assertTrue\/assertFalse should be simplified to the corresponding dedicated assertion",
"type": "CODE_SMELL",
"status": "ready",
"remediation": {
"func": "Constant\/Issue",
"constantCost": "2min"
},
"tags": [
"tests"
],

View File

@ -2,6 +2,10 @@
"title": "Functions, methods and lambdas should not have too many mandatory parameters",
"type": "CODE_SMELL",
"status": "ready",
"remediation": {
"func": "Constant\/Issue",
"constantCost": "20min"
},
"tags": [
"brain-overload",
"design"

View File

@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ This rule raises an issue when ``++computeIfAbsent++`` or ``++computeIfPresent++
== Noncompliant Code Example
----
map.computeIfAbsent(key, k -> null); // Noncompliant, te map will not contain an entry key->null.
map.computeIfAbsent(key, k -> null); // Noncompliant, the map will not contain an entry key->null.
map.computeIfPresent(key, (k, oldValue) -> null); // Noncompliant
----
@ -26,5 +26,5 @@ if (map.containsKey(key)) {
== See also
* S3824 - "Map.get" and value test should be replaced with single method call
* S3824 - "Map.get" and value test should be replaced with a single method call