## Review
A dedicated reviewer checked the rule description successfully for:
- [ ] logical errors and incorrect information
- [ ] information gaps and missing content
- [ ] text style and tone
- [ ] PR summary and labels follow [the
guidelines](https://github.com/SonarSource/rspec/#to-modify-an-existing-rule)
## Review
A dedicated reviewer checked the rule description successfully for:
- [ ] logical errors and incorrect information
- [ ] information gaps and missing content
- [ ] text style and tone
- [ ] PR summary and labels follow [the
guidelines](https://github.com/SonarSource/rspec/#to-modify-an-existing-rule)
---------
Co-authored-by: nicolas-gauthier-sonarsource <121794895+nicolas-gauthier-sonarsource@users.noreply.github.com>
Adding in additional material and a bit of refactoring for clarity.
## Review
A dedicated reviewer checked the rule description successfully for:
- [ ] logical errors and incorrect information
- [ ] information gaps and missing content
- [ ] text style and tone
- [ ] PR summary and labels follow [the
guidelines](https://github.com/SonarSource/rspec/#to-modify-an-existing-rule)
---------
Co-authored-by: Loris S. <91723853+loris-s-sonarsource@users.noreply.github.com>
## Review
A dedicated reviewer checked the rule description successfully for:
- [ ] logical errors and incorrect information
- [ ] information gaps and missing content
- [ ] text style and tone
- [ ] PR summary and labels follow [the
guidelines](https://github.com/SonarSource/rspec/#to-modify-an-existing-rule)
## Review
A dedicated reviewer checked the rule description successfully for:
- [ ] logical errors and incorrect information
- [ ] information gaps and missing content
- [ ] text style and tone
- [ ] PR summary and labels follow [the
guidelines](https://github.com/SonarSource/rspec/#to-modify-an-existing-rule)
## Review
A dedicated reviewer checked the rule description successfully for:
- [x] logical errors and incorrect information
- [x] information gaps and missing content
- [x] text style and tone
- [x] PR summary and labels follow [the
guidelines](https://github.com/SonarSource/rspec/#to-modify-an-existing-rule)
## Review
A dedicated reviewer checked the rule description successfully for:
- [ ] logical errors and incorrect information
- [ ] information gaps and missing content
- [ ] text style and tone
- [ ] PR summary and labels follow [the
guidelines](https://github.com/SonarSource/rspec/#to-modify-an-existing-rule)
## Review
A dedicated reviewer checked the rule description successfully for:
- [x] logical errors and incorrect information
- [x] information gaps and missing content
- [x] text style and tone
- [x] PR summary and labels follow [the
guidelines](https://github.com/SonarSource/rspec/#to-modify-an-existing-rule)
---------
Co-authored-by: Egon Okerman <egon.okerman@sonarsource.com>
## Review
A dedicated reviewer checked the rule description successfully for:
- [x] logical errors and incorrect information
- [x] information gaps and missing content
- [x] text style and tone
- [x] PR summary and labels follow [the
guidelines](https://github.com/SonarSource/rspec/#to-modify-an-existing-rule)
This PR also removes the java folder because it is not implemented and
has no implementation plan. This PR was made spontaneously during
Daniel's onboarding.
---------
Co-authored-by: daniel-teuchert-sonarsource <141642369+daniel-teuchert-sonarsource@users.noreply.github.com>
## Review
A dedicated reviewer checked the rule description successfully for:
- [x] logical errors and incorrect information
- [x] information gaps and missing content
- [x] text style and tone
- [x] PR summary and labels follow [the
guidelines](https://github.com/SonarSource/rspec/#to-modify-an-existing-rule)
Indent sections in the rule description guide to improve readability.
Cross-reference the link standard in the rule description guide.
## Review
A dedicated reviewer checked the rule description successfully for:
- [x] logical errors and incorrect information
- [x] information gaps and missing content
- [x] text style and tone
- [x] PR summary and labels follow [the
guidelines](https://github.com/SonarSource/rspec/#to-modify-an-existing-rule)
Added in CWE as pre-defined link.
## Review
A dedicated reviewer checked the rule description successfully for:
- [ ] logical errors and incorrect information
- [ ] information gaps and missing content
- [ ] text style and tone
- [ ] PR summary and labels follow [the
guidelines](https://github.com/SonarSource/rspec/#to-modify-an-existing-rule)
Fixed rule link example so that rule number was also part of the
underlined link.
## Review
A dedicated reviewer checked the rule description successfully for:
- [ ] logical errors and incorrect information
- [ ] information gaps and missing content
- [ ] text style and tone
- [ ] PR summary and labels follow [the
guidelines](https://github.com/SonarSource/rspec/#to-modify-an-existing-rule)
Added in formatting guidance for links that appear in rules.
## Review
A dedicated reviewer checked the rule description successfully for:
- [x] logical errors and incorrect information
- [x] information gaps and missing content
- [x] text style and tone
- [x] PR summary and labels follow [the
guidelines](https://github.com/SonarSource/rspec/#to-modify-an-existing-rule)
---------
Co-authored-by: Martin Strecker <103252490+martin-strecker-sonarsource@users.noreply.github.com>
## Review
A dedicated reviewer checked the rule description successfully for:
- [x] logical errors and incorrect information
- [x] information gaps and missing content
- [x] text style and tone
- [x] PR summary and labels follow [the
guidelines](https://github.com/SonarSource/rspec/#to-modify-an-existing-rule)
---------
Co-authored-by: hendrik-buchwald-sonarsource <64110887+hendrik-buchwald-sonarsource@users.noreply.github.com>
When an include is not surrounded by empty lines, its content is inlined
on the same line as the adjacent content. That can lead to broken tags
and other display issues.
This PR fixes all such includes and introduces a validation step that
forbids introducing the same problem again.
Created a tone guide to help rules authors make their content as
compelling for their users as possible.
## Review
A dedicated reviewer checked the rule description successfully for:
- [x] logical errors and incorrect information
- [x] information gaps and missing content
- [x] text style and tone
