## Review
A dedicated reviewer checked the rule description successfully for:
- [ ] logical errors and incorrect information
- [ ] information gaps and missing content
- [ ] text style and tone
- [ ] PR summary and labels follow [the
guidelines](https://github.com/SonarSource/rspec/#to-modify-an-existing-rule)
---------
Co-authored-by: daniel-teuchert-sonarsource <141642369+daniel-teuchert-sonarsource@users.noreply.github.com>
## Review
A dedicated reviewer checked the rule description successfully for:
- [ ] logical errors and incorrect information
- [ ] information gaps and missing content
- [ ] text style and tone
- [ ] PR summary and labels follow [the
guidelines](https://github.com/SonarSource/rspec/#to-modify-an-existing-rule)
---------
Co-authored-by: daniel-teuchert-sonarsource <141642369+daniel-teuchert-sonarsource@users.noreply.github.com>
- Metadata is updated so that it is consistent with the metadata of the
new MISRA rule M23_321. See SonarSource/sonar-cpp#3006.
- Correct the spec since the implementation has been updated later so
that it raises only on built-in and pointer types. See
SonarSource/sonar-cpp#684.
## Review
A dedicated reviewer checked the rule description successfully for:
- [x] logical errors and incorrect information
- [x] information gaps and missing content
- [x] text style and tone
- [x] PR summary and labels follow [the
guidelines](https://github.com/SonarSource/rspec/#to-modify-an-existing-rule)
## Review
A dedicated reviewer checked the rule description successfully for:
- [ ] logical errors and incorrect information
- [ ] information gaps and missing content
- [ ] text style and tone
- [ ] PR summary and labels follow [the
guidelines](https://github.com/SonarSource/rspec/#to-modify-an-existing-rule)
## Review
A dedicated reviewer checked the rule description successfully for:
- [ ] logical errors and incorrect information
- [ ] information gaps and missing content
- [ ] text style and tone
- [ ] PR summary and labels follow [the
guidelines](https://github.com/SonarSource/rspec/#to-modify-an-existing-rule)
---------
Co-authored-by: Loris S. <91723853+loris-s-sonarsource@users.noreply.github.com>
## Review
A dedicated reviewer checked the rule description successfully for:
- [x] logical errors and incorrect information
- [x] information gaps and missing content
- [x] text style and tone
- [x] PR summary and labels follow [the
guidelines](https://github.com/SonarSource/rspec/#to-modify-an-existing-rule)
## Review
A dedicated reviewer checked the rule description successfully for:
- [ ] logical errors and incorrect information
- [ ] information gaps and missing content
- [ ] text style and tone
- [ ] PR summary and labels follow [the
guidelines](https://github.com/SonarSource/rspec/#to-modify-an-existing-rule)
This PR adjusts the retention period from the compliant examples so that
they do not raise security hotspots when scanned with the Sonarway
profile.
## Review
A dedicated reviewer checked the rule description successfully for:
- [ ] logical errors and incorrect information
- [ ] information gaps and missing content
- [ ] text style and tone
- [ ] PR summary and labels follow [the
guidelines](https://github.com/SonarSource/rspec/#to-modify-an-existing-rule)
This PR changes the JSON examples for ARM rules to make sure that the
code samples will be scanned by sonar-iac-plugin.
To ensure this all resources need a name field and the schema URL has to
be an https and not http URL.
## Review
A dedicated reviewer checked the rule description successfully for:
- [ ] logical errors and incorrect information
- [ ] information gaps and missing content
- [ ] text style and tone
- [ ] PR summary and labels follow [the
guidelines](https://github.com/SonarSource/rspec/#to-modify-an-existing-rule)
This PR fixes the code examples for ARM for rule S6329 so that they can
be scanned with Sonarqube.
The schema URL for the JSON examples has to be https and for the bicep
examples, the correct quotes need to be used.
## Review
A dedicated reviewer checked the rule description successfully for:
- [ ] logical errors and incorrect information
- [ ] information gaps and missing content
- [ ] text style and tone
- [ ] PR summary and labels follow [the
guidelines](https://github.com/SonarSource/rspec/#to-modify-an-existing-rule)
## Review
A dedicated reviewer checked the rule description successfully for:
- [ ] logical errors and incorrect information
- [ ] information gaps and missing content
- [ ] text style and tone
- [ ] PR summary and labels follow [the
guidelines](https://github.com/SonarSource/rspec/#to-modify-an-existing-rule)
## Review
A dedicated reviewer checked the rule description successfully for:
- [ ] logical errors and incorrect information
- [ ] information gaps and missing content
- [ ] text style and tone
- [ ] PR summary and labels follow [the
guidelines](https://github.com/SonarSource/rspec/#to-modify-an-existing-rule)
## Review
A dedicated reviewer checked the rule description successfully for:
- [ ] logical errors and incorrect information
- [ ] information gaps and missing content
- [ ] text style and tone
- [ ] PR summary and labels follow [the
guidelines](https://github.com/SonarSource/rspec/#to-modify-an-existing-rule)
---------
Co-authored-by: Jonas Wielage <127737854+jonas-wielage-sonarsource@users.noreply.github.com>
## Review
A dedicated reviewer checked the rule description successfully for:
- [ ] logical errors and incorrect information
- [ ] information gaps and missing content
- [ ] text style and tone
- [ ] PR summary and labels follow [the
guidelines](https://github.com/SonarSource/rspec/#to-modify-an-existing-rule)
---------
Co-authored-by: Loris S. <91723853+loris-s-sonarsource@users.noreply.github.com>
## Review
A dedicated reviewer checked the rule description successfully for:
- [ ] logical errors and incorrect information
- [ ] information gaps and missing content
- [ ] text style and tone
- [ ] PR summary and labels follow [the
guidelines](https://github.com/SonarSource/rspec/#to-modify-an-existing-rule)
## Review
A dedicated reviewer checked the rule description successfully for:
- [ ] logical errors and incorrect information
- [ ] information gaps and missing content
- [ ] text style and tone
- [ ] PR summary and labels follow [the
guidelines](https://github.com/SonarSource/rspec/#to-modify-an-existing-rule)
## Review
A dedicated reviewer checked the rule description successfully for:
- [ ] logical errors and incorrect information
- [ ] information gaps and missing content
- [ ] text style and tone
- [ ] PR summary and labels follow [the
guidelines](https://github.com/SonarSource/rspec/#to-modify-an-existing-rule)
## Review
A dedicated reviewer checked the rule description successfully for:
- [ ] logical errors and incorrect information
- [ ] information gaps and missing content
- [ ] text style and tone
- [ ] PR summary and labels follow [the
guidelines](https://github.com/SonarSource/rspec/#to-modify-an-existing-rule)
