The PRs #3365, #3374, #3386, #3391 and #3392 were merged before
implementation. This reverts them, to be merged only once implemented.
## Review
A dedicated reviewer checked the rule description successfully for:
- [ ] logical errors and incorrect information
- [ ] information gaps and missing content
- [ ] text style and tone
- [ ] PR summary and labels follow [the
guidelines](https://github.com/SonarSource/rspec/#to-modify-an-existing-rule)
This PR reverts some changes made in
https://github.com/SonarSource/rspec/pull/3373 to ensure that the
documentation will only be shown do users once the detection logic is
implemented.
## Review
A dedicated reviewer checked the rule description successfully for:
- [ ] logical errors and incorrect information
- [ ] information gaps and missing content
- [ ] text style and tone
- [ ] PR summary and labels follow [the
guidelines](https://github.com/SonarSource/rspec/#to-modify-an-existing-rule)
## Review
A dedicated reviewer checked the rule description successfully for:
- [ ] logical errors and incorrect information
- [ ] information gaps and missing content
- [ ] text style and tone
- [ ] PR summary and labels follow [the
guidelines](https://github.com/SonarSource/rspec/#to-modify-an-existing-rule)
---------
Co-authored-by: Egon Okerman <egon.okerman@sonarsource.com>
## Review
A dedicated reviewer checked the rule description successfully for:
- [ ] logical errors and incorrect information
- [ ] information gaps and missing content
- [ ] text style and tone
- [ ] PR summary and labels follow [the
guidelines](https://github.com/SonarSource/rspec/#to-modify-an-existing-rule)
Improvement identified in #2790.
Add a prefix to the diff-id when it is used multiple times in different
"how to fix it in XYZ" sections to avoid ambiguity and pedantically
follow the spec:
> A single and unique diff-id should be used only once for each type of
code example as shown in the description of a rule.
Obvious typos around `diff-type` were fixed.
An obvious extra use of diff blocks was removed.
## Review
A dedicated reviewer checked the rule description successfully for:
- [ ] logical errors and incorrect information
- [ ] information gaps and missing content
- [ ] text style and tone
- [ ] PR summary and labels follow [the
guidelines](https://github.com/SonarSource/rspec/#to-modify-an-existing-rule)
