== Why is this an issue?

include::../description.adoc[]

include::../noncompliant.adoc[]

include::../compliant.adoc[]

=== Exceptions

When the type of the field is the containing class and that field is static, no issue is raised to allow singletons named like the type. 


----
public class Foo {
  ...
  private static Foo foo;
  public Foo getInstance() {
    if(foo==null) {
      foo = new Foo();
    }
    return foo;
  }
  ...
}
----
ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]

'''
== Implementation Specification
(visible only on this page)

include::../message.adoc[]

'''
== Comments And Links
(visible only on this page)

=== on 21 Nov 2024, 16:48:00 Alban Auzeill wrote:
[test-code-support-investigation-for-java] Decision for scope: Keep 'Main'. This affects a lot code used as test source, like class Foo with method foo. It could be annoying for users.

endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]