=== on 13 May 2015, 20:05:03 Ann Campbell wrote:
\[~tamas.vajk] please provide R# id if relevant.

=== on 18 May 2015, 08:30:35 Tamas Vajk wrote:
\[~ann.campbell.2] Couldn't find a R# id, just a link: \https://confluence.jetbrains.com/display/ReSharper/Field+can+be+made+read-only

=== on 19 May 2015, 20:12:16 Ann Campbell wrote:
Thanks [~tamas.vajk], I figured it out. Please review the rule.

=== on 20 May 2015, 07:06:43 Tamas Vajk wrote:
LGTM

=== on 16 Nov 2020, 14:20:48 Andrei Epure wrote:
\[~nicolas.harraudeau] should we extend this to static fields and static constructors as well?

=== on 16 Nov 2020, 16:20:02 Nicolas Harraudeau wrote:
After discussing with [~andrei.epure] we agreed that there isn't much value in raising issues on static fields right now. This rule already raises thousands of issues on multiple projects and we should think about how to improve the rule before adding new noncompliant cases.

