== Why is this an issue?

include::../description.adoc[]

=== Noncompliant code example

Case 1, the code is syntactically correct but the behavior is not the expected one

[source,javascript]
----
switch (day) {
  case MONDAY:
  case TUESDAY:
  WEDNESDAY:   // instead of "case WEDNESDAY"
    doSomething();
    break;
  ...
}
----

Case 2, the code is correct and behaves as expected but is hardly readable 


[source,javascript]
----
switch (day) {
  case MONDAY:
    break;
  case TUESDAY:
    foo:for(i = 0 ; i < X ; i++) {
         /* ... */
        break foo;  // this break statement doesn't relate to the nesting case TUESDAY
         /* ... */
    }
    break;
    /* ... */
}
----

=== Compliant solution

Case 1

[source,javascript]
----
switch (day) {
  case MONDAY:
  case TUESDAY:
  case WEDNESDAY:
    doSomething();
    break;
  ...
}
----

Case 2

[source,javascript]
----
switch (day) {
  case MONDAY:
    break;
  case TUESDAY:
    compute(args); // put the content of the labelled "for" statement in a dedicated method
    break;

    /* ... */
}
----

ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]

'''
== Implementation Specification
(visible only on this page)

include::../message.adoc[]

'''
== Comments And Links
(visible only on this page)

include::../comments-and-links.adoc[]

endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]