== Why is this an issue?

Any insert which omits a value for a ``++NOT NULL++`` column in a database table will be automatically rejected by the database unless a default value has been specified for the column.


*Noteworthy* 

This rule raises issues only when a *Database Catalog* is provided during the analysis. See \https://docs.sonarqube.org/latest/analysis/languages/cobol/


=== Noncompliant code example

With the table ``++MY_TABLE++`` having a ``++NOT NULL++`` column ``++N2++`` without default value and a ``++NOT NULL++`` column ``++N3++`` with default value:

[source,text]
----
EXEC SQL
  INSERT INTO MY_TABLE  *> Noncompliant; N2 value omitted
  (
    N1
  )
  VALUES 
  (
    :ITQ1-NUMBER,
  )
END-EXEC.
----


=== Compliant solution

[source,text]
----
EXEC SQL
  INSERT INTO MY_TABLE  *> Compliant even though N3 value not supplied
  (
    N1,
    N2
  )
  VALUES 
  (
    :ITQ1-NUMBER,
    :ITQ2-NUMBER,
  )
END-EXEC.
----