== Why is this an issue?

There's no point in having a JUnit ``++TestCase++`` without any test methods. Similarly, you shouldn't have a file in the tests directory named ``++*Test++``, ``++*Tests++``, or ``++*TestCase++``, but no tests in the file. Doing either of these things may lead someone to think that uncovered classes have been tested.


This rule raises an issue when files in the test directory are named ``++*Test++``, ``++*Tests++``, or ``++*TestCase++`` or implement ``++TestCase++`` but don't contain any tests.


Supported frameworks:

* JUnit3
* JUnit4
* JUnit5
* TestNG
* Zohhak
* ArchUnit
* Pact

ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]

'''
== Implementation Specification
(visible only on this page)

include::../message.adoc[]

'''
== Comments And Links
(visible only on this page)

include::../comments-and-links.adoc[]

endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]