Changing an inherited member to ``++private++`` will not prevent access to the base class implementation.


This rule raises an issue when a ``++private++`` method in an unsealed type has a signature that is identical to a ``++public++`` method declared in a base type.


== Noncompliant Code Example

----
using System;

namespace MyLibrary
{
  public class Foo
  {
    public void SomeMethod(int count) { }
  }
  public class Bar:Foo
  {
    private void SomeMethod(int count) { } // Noncompliant
  }
}
----


== Compliant Solution

----
using System;

namespace MyLibrary
{
  public class Foo
  {
    public void SomeMethod(int count) { }
  }
  public sealed class Bar : Foo
  {
    private void SomeMethod(int count) { }
  }
}
----


ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]

'''
== Implementation Specification
(visible only on this page)

include::message.adoc[]

include::highlighting.adoc[]

'''
== Comments And Links
(visible only on this page)

include::comments-and-links.adoc[]
endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]